WDC TV News
Politics

US Civil Rights Commissioners Ask Blistering Questions About Garland Labeling Parents as ‘Domestic Terrorists’ – RedState


The extra I see Lawyer Common Merrick Garland in motion the extra I depend America’s fortunate stars that the then-Senate Majority Chief saved this man the hell away from the US Supreme Court docket — which little doubt nonetheless angers the chief legislation enforcement official of our nation. Shudder the thought.

Earlier than we proceed, let’s get one factor straight.

Whereas the Lawyer Common serves on the pleasure of the president of the US and is the chief authorized counsel of the President, the Lawyer Common just isn’t the president’s private lawyer nor that of the president’s celebration; the Lawyer Common is the federal authorities’s chief lawyer. That utilized to Jeff Classes and Invoice Barr below Trump — a lot to Trump’s chagrin — and it applies to Merrick Garland, as he has admitted. The issue being Garland just isn’t training what he preaches. And now “the remainder of the story.”

As reported by Fox Information on Saturday, 4 out of the eight members of the usCommission on Civil Rights have penned a letter to Garland, ripping the Lawyer Common for his latest ridiculous memo during which he labeled dad and mom who protest at college board conferences over the indoctrination of their children with the illness of so-called “important race concept,” youngster vaccination mandates — and regardless of the hell else their First Modification rights assure — as “home terrorists.” Hilarious on its face; ominous in apply.

The members who signed onto the letter embrace Commissioners Peter Kirsanow, J. Christian Adams, Gail Heriot, and Stephen Gilchrist, famous Fox. They wrote, partially (emphasis mine):

Your memorandum didn’t cite any particular examples of ‘harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence that would supply any foundation for legislation enforcement motion by the Division.

We’re involved that a lot of what the NSBA (Nationwide Faculty Board Affiliation) calls threats and acts of intimidation—and compares to “home terrorism and hate crimes”— could be merely categorised as political speech.

The members had been additionally adamant about Garland’s insistence that protesting dad and mom signify a nationwide safety risk — once more, a preposterous notion.

We now have combed the web for indicators that oldsters petitioning faculty boards are something approaching a nationwide drawback. Practically all of what we have now seen up to now makes us proud to be Individuals: Dad and mom care concerning the schooling of their kids, and they don’t seem to be keen to permit them to be indoctrinated right into a radical ideology.

Merrick Garland, Joe Biden, and your complete Democrat Occasion had been unavailable for remark.

The scorching letter wrapped up with a collection of blistering questions:

It’s all the time attainable that just a few of those dad and mom have gotten out of hand and made threats that they need to not have. In that case, legislation enforcement is fully applicable. However is there proof that state and native legislation enforcement is less than the job?

Why is federal intervention wanted right here and never within the hundreds of different unrelated instances of overheated exchanges that happen usually throughout the nation? Why does this case name for federal intervention?

Is it stunning to you that involved dad and mom throughout the nation view your memorandum as an endorsement of the NSBA’s description of their protests as akin to “home terrorism”?

And at last, the Civil Rights Fee members requested Garland to supply particular examples of so-called “home terrorism” dedicated by dad and mom protesting for the wellbeing of their kids:

We now ask you to supply us with particular examples of “harassment, intimidation and threats of violence” that you just purport permit for legislation enforcement motion and a proof of why this can be a scenario that requires federal intervention specifically.

U.S. Civil Rights Commissioners: 1, Merrick Garland: 0. Ultimate rating. Sport, set, match.

Thanks for taking part in, Mr. Garland, now put up or shut up.





Source link

Related posts

CNN’s Don Lemon Claims Trump Exposed The U.S. As Racist – ‘Showed Us The Truth’

WDC TV Staff

Texas Democrats Flee State In Private Plane To Stop Republican Election Integrity Vote

WDC TV Staff

Ron Johnson Trashes Trump In Undercover Video And Admits Wisconsin Election Was Legit

WDC TV Staff